Health and Diet Extremism

I will be adding to this post.  

2016
"Foods That Can Cause Problems", color and bolding added by me, @thyroiduk_org
http://www.thyroiduk.org.uk/tuk/treatment/foods.html#

"Goitrogenic foods can act like an antithyroid drug in disabling the thyroid function. They prevent the thyroid from using available iodine. ... made worse if you use a lot of salt ... causes the thyroid to swell. ... Do not eat these in large amounts if you are taking thyroid hormone replacement. ... Brussels sprouts, ... turnips, cauliflower, cabbage ... kale ... Almonds, peanuts ... walnuts ... Sweetcorn ... Soya ... combined with a high fibre diet causes too much thyroid hormone and iodine to be excreted from the body ... cook these foods thoroughly if you want to eat them"

2015

"Are chocolate's health claims for real"? color and bolding added by me

http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/superfoods/Pages/is-chocolate-a-superfood.aspx 

"A range of health benefits from the consumption of cocoa products have been investigated, particularly in relation to cardiovascular disease, with early results showing promise." = UNPROVEN

2015 - The basis of a LOT of raw cacao health claims!

"Chocolate's health touters 'may have misunderstood local reality' of tribe", color and bolding added by me, @CBCNews

http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/chocolate-s-health-touters-may-have-misunderstood-local-reality-of-tribe-1.2883561

"I looked into how much locally grown cacao people were actually consuming and the results were quite outstanding," Barnes said. "It would appear as though they are not consuming much at all."

"Where Chocolate Begins and Research Methods End: Understanding Kuna Cacao Consumption", 2013, by Jeffrey Ivan Barnes, color and bolding added by me
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253329299_Where_Chocolate_Begins_and_Research_Methods_End_Understanding_Kuna_Cacao_Consumption

"I found that the actual consumption of locally grown cacao among Kuna people is negligible, notwithstanding the claims of researchers" 

What made the above story interesting to me wasn't one researcher's contradiction of the claims - it was media IGNORING the story until 2015 - on top of the fact those SAME other claims remain UNPROVEN today - except to unscrupulous manufacturers - and of course quacks - all shilling for money! 

It's now 2016 - and they are not there now either! The EFSA has approved a cocoa flavanol health claim with stipulations! 
2015 
"BARRY CALLEBAUT GUIDANCE ON THE USE OF THE COCOA FLAVANOL HEALTH CLAIM IN THE EUROPEAN UNION", color and bolding added by me 
http://www.acticoa.com/uploads/guidance_EU.pdf

"it is not authorised to refer to any disease risk factor or to children’s development or health. Using the claim on products specifically designed for children can therefore not bear the cocoa flavanol health claim." for example.

2014

"US cocoa flavanol health claim nears but ‘not quite there yet’", @ConfectioneryNw
http://www.confectionerynews.com/Ingredients/US-cocoa-flavanol-health-claim-nears-but-not-quite-there-yet?utm_source=AddThis_twitter&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=SocialMedia#.VrAmJXFcJBg.twitter

Love this! Read banana ingredients! 

2014

"Food Fears", @ScienceBasedMed
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/food-fears/

Some people who only eat raw food ignore real toxic ingredients because "all chemicals are "bad", and they do not realize chemicals are in EVERYTHING, including raw food. Processes (cooking, baking, pasteurization, etc.) do not necessarily make food less nutritious. They can make it more so, and SAFE to eat.  

2013 
"Ask Well: Does Boiling or Baking Vegetables Destroy Their Vitamins?", @nytimeswell

"Several studies have shown that while cooking can degrade some nutrients, it can enhance the availability of others. As a result, no single cooking or preparation method is best, and that includes eating vegetables raw." 

2013 
It is not a good idea to indulge in buckwheat sprouts, or adopt extremism in health or diets, ignoring reputable science.

From the pdf
"Since there is no accurate toxicological information on fagopyrin, safe intake of buckwheat sprouts can be estimated on the basis of hypericin phototoxic doses if further consideration of molecular differences ... to hypericin is not done. Taking this into account, the consumption of 0.14 g of dry mass sprouts per kg body mass per day can be estimated, which corresponds to approximately 40 sprouts. The intake of 10 g of dry mass (or approximately 30 g of fresh mass) of buckwheat sprouts may, on the other hand, cause severe phototoxicity, but this might strongly depend on the exposure to sunlight, body mass and age." 

See also the Townsend Letter, 2004, which the pdf research published in 2013 backs up, and poses more questions. 
http//www.townsendletter.com/Dec2004/buckwheat1204.htm  

2011

"Can you substitute cacao powder for cocoa powder in recipes?, @thekitchn
http://www.thekitchn.com/good-questions-243-148454
See comment by Cocoa Lady 
"Maybe that is why bigger, more serious companies don't have this product, since they do not want to be liable for false advertising ... I just disagree with misleading the general public just to make juicy profits." So do I! Kudos to you!

How To Save Time And Money Over Any Holidays And Recover From Money Spent On Them

Updated January 3, 2013. Happy New Year, no matter what your circumstances have been and are and may 2013 see you and yours well.

To help you save time and money this and any year, remember the basics.

Cosmetics do not need to be expensive to work. They just need to work. Marketing cosmetics is about selling you a product at a profit, in many cases, regardless of how well it can work. Often that marketing entails stretching the truth as to how effective that product may be for the purpose intended and contains misleading information, that contravenes regulations, in effect, making the product a drug. Currently, there are only two recognized drugs for hair restoration and growth and they are both government approved and regulated. While scientific researchers are looking for new drugs that are effective for those issues, the hype continues. See this post for more details.

You do not need to pile on products to have great hair or skin. You can save both time and money by using less products more effectively. See this post for more details.

Not all products are best used, when certain scalp conditions or other conditions are present. See this post.

I get feedback from people who email me asking for recommendations for hair and skin care. By far in the majority of cases, simple hair and skin care has worked best. I have heard back from friends and others alike on cosmetic mineral oil being all that has been required to solve issues with both in many cases, whether it is used with other products like less conditioner or alone. It can return hair to a frizz-free softness, shine and manageability not seen or felt in years, even if the hair has been chemically damaged and abused and it is antistatic. Allergic reactions can cause hair shedding. Cosmetic mineral oil is not a known allergen or sensitizer. Cosmetic mineral oil is a natural product that has been purified. It is safe to use and does not clog pores.

"Chemical-free" cosmetics are not possible, since everything contains chemicals. It is a matter of whether the chemicals are safe to use in cosmetics. Not all are in the quantities used in a number of products. Safety also depends on where and how the product is made and preserved and whether regulations in place have been applied. Some countries do not have stringent cosmetic regulations. Some cosmetic products at first escape notification and inspection and later can be put on government advisories, as in this post, or as in the FDA Press Announcement linked below are seized and removed from the market.

While government regulations and actions taken regarding cosmetics and their safety are being improved, the allegation often made by cosmetic marketers, that consumers are unprotected by regulations in place is patently false. What is important to help regulations be enforced is consumer reporting of adverse effects and advertising claims, that go beyond what is regulated. Reporting can help others, by preventing them from having the problems you experienced. That is not restricted to informing the appropriate government agencies.

It is not a good idea, when you have a serious scalp or skin problem that needs medically qualified attention, to seek treatment advice via the Internet. The best advice you can get is to inform your doctor or dermatologist about everything you are using and may have used to self-medicate, which is vital to help them and you get to the source of a problem. A number of natural products are known allergens in scientific research literature available online and to medical professionals.

Consumers can experience allergic reactions and sensitization caused by unsuspected sources, like essential oils used in cosmetic products. Such reactions may also be caused by spice ingredients in cosmetics, even though you have not had problems with them used in small quantities, or infrequent use in food, in the past. If the doctor or dermatologist is unhelpful, get another medically qualified opinion. To me, a good medically qualified practitioner keeps up with the latest medical research and opinions, is willing to discuss treatment options with you and make you aware of possible side effects.

You can research information as well, that you can bring to your doctor or dermatologist's attention and ask questions. Do not be afraid to do so, as you ultimately decide what you are going to do and you are in charge of your health. However, self-medicating is not the way to go when medically qualified help is needed. There is a growing number of unscrupulous vendors, only too willing to help you for a price, that can be far too dear to pay.

The majority of cosmetics on the market are safe and are kept so by government regulations, as well as proper manufacturing and marketing practices, by reputable cosmetic companies. You can make a substantial contribution to that. By simply reporting complete details to your doctor or dermatologist and government agencies, you can protect others and yourself, from future cosmetic-related problems.

See Also
This forum thread, this one and this one
Newspaper article 2012
FDA Press Announcement 2012
Natural Standard Article on the FDA Press Anouncement
Alternative Medicine: Mayo Clinic 2011
Essential Oils and Allergic Reactions: Mayo Clinic 2011
Essential Oils and Dermatitis: Research Review 2012
Spices: Allergies and Cosmetics 2012
ACAAI: Newsroom 2012
Abstract 2011
Contact Allergy: Ginger 2011
Spice Allergies: Occurrence 2007
Spices: Contact Allergies 2002
Lead in lipstick: FDA 2012
Lead in food products: FDA 2011
Sulfates and preservatives 2012